Friday, March 7, 2008

Saartjie Baartman this one is for you



Saartjie "Sarah" Baartman (1789 – December 29, 1815) was the most famous of at least two Khoikhoi women who were exhibited as sideshow attractions in 19th century Europe under the name Hottentot Venus—"Hottentot" as the then-current name for the Khoi people (see further discussion of this now offensive term), and "Venus" in reference to the Venus figurines.



Life

Africa
Saartje Baartman was born to a Khoisan family in the vicinity of the Gamtoos River in what is now the Eastern Cape of South Africa. She was orphaned in a commando raid. Saartjie, pronounced "Sahr-key", is the Afrikaans form of her name; it translates to English as "Little Sarah", where the use of the diminutive form commonly indicates familiarity or endearment rather than a literally short stature. Her original name is unknown.

Baartman was a slave [1][2][3] of Dutch farmers near Cape Town when Hendrick Cezar, the brother of her slave owner, suggested that she travel to England for exhibition, promising her that she would become wealthy. Lord Caledon, governor of the Cape, gave permission for the trip, but later regretted it after he gained a complete understanding of its purpose. She left for London in 1810.


Great Britain
Saartjie travelled around Britain, showing what to Europeans were unusual bodily features, thought to be typical of her people. She had large buttocks, a condition known as steatopygia, and visitors were permitted to touch them for extra payment. In addition, she had a sinus pudoris, otherwise known as the tablier (the French word for "apron") or "curtain of shame", all names for the elongated labia of some Khoisan women. (Although "sinus pudoris" refers only to the labia of Khoisan woman, all labia vary in size and shape to some degree.) To quote Stephen Jay Gould, "The labia minora, or inner lips, of the ordinary female genitalia are greatly enlarged in Khoi-San women, and may hang down three or four inches below the vagina when women stand, thus giving the impression of a separate and enveloping curtain of skin" (Gould, 1985). Saartjie never allowed this trait to be exhibited while she was alive.[4]

Her exhibition in London, scant years after the passing of the Slave Trade Act 1807, created a scandal. An abolitionist benevolent society called the African Association, the equivalent of a charity or pressure group, petitioned for her release. Baartman was questioned before a court in Dutch, in which she was fluent, and stated that she was not under restraint and understood perfectly that she was guaranteed half of the profits. The conditions under which she made these statements are suspect, because it directly contradicts accounts of her exhibitions made by Zachary Macaulay of the African Institution and other eyewitnesses.[5]


France

Baartman later traveled to Napoleonic Paris where an animal trainer exhibited her under more pressured conditions for fifteen months. French anatomist Georges Cuvier and French naturalists visited her and she was the subject of several scientific paintings at the Jardin du Roy.

She died December 29, 1815 of an inflammatory ailment, possibly smallpox, while other sources suggest she contracted pneumonia. An autopsy was conducted and the findings published by French anatomist Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville in 1816 and by Cuvier in the Memoires du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle in 1817. Cuvier notes in his monograph that Baartman was an intelligent woman who had an excellent memory and spoke Dutch fluently. Her skeleton, preserved genitals and brain were placed on display in Paris's Musée de l'Homme until 1974, when they were removed from public view and stored out of sight.


Legacy

There were sporadic calls for the return of her remains beginning in the 1940s but the case became prominent only after U.S. biologist Stephen Jay Gould published an account, The Hottentot Venus, in the 1980s. When Nelson Mandela became president of South Africa in 1994, he formally requested that France return the remains. After much legal wrangling and debates in the French National Assembly, France acceded to the request on 6 March 2002. Her remains were repatriated to her homeland, the Gamtoos Valley, on 6 May 2002, over 200 years after her birth.

Baartman became an icon in South Africa as representative of so many aspects of their history. The Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children [1], a refuge for survivors of domestic violence, opened in Cape Town in 1999. South Africa's first offshore environmental protection vessel is named after Sarah Baartman. News24.com article


Cultural references
Dame Edith Sitwell allusively refered to her in "Hornpipe", a poem in the satirical collection "Facade" [2]

Diana Ferrus, a South African poet of Khoisan descent, wrote "A Poem for Sarah Baartman" while studying in Europe. It includes the desire "to wrench [her] away-/ away from the poking eyes..."

Poet Elizabeth Alexander explores her story in a 1987 poem and 1990 book, both entitled The Venus Hottentot.

The science fiction author Paul Di Filippo used her story as the basis for the second novel of his Steampunk Trilogy.

Barbara Chase-Riboud wrote a fictional biography entitled Hottentot Venus.
Her life features in the 2007 Afrikaans romantic novel Frats by Chris Karsten.
Playwright Suzan-Lori Parks fictionalizes her story in Venus.

In 2006, a feminist artist and filmmaker adapted the name Venus Hottentot to direct an independent film with erotic content called Afrodite Superstar with the intention of reclaiming the strength and voice of Sarah Baartman as a sexually exploited woman of color.

Canadian performance artist Mara Verna created a web-based project and travelling exhibition cataloguing her story. [3]


bio info from Wikipedia

Thursday, March 6, 2008

THE LAST LECTURE BY RANDY PAUSCH





Born
Randolph Frederick Pausch
October 23, 1960 (1960-10-23) (age 47)

Employer
Carnegie Mellon University

Known for
Creator of Alice software projectco-founder of CMU's Entertainment Technology CenterVirtual Reality Research with Disney ImagineersInspirational speeches regarding lifeBattle with cancer


Randy Pausch (born
October 23, 1960) is a 47 year-old Professor of Computer Science, Human-Computer Interaction, and Design at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In September 2006, he was diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer. He pursued a very aggressive cancer treatment that included major surgery and experimental chemotherapy; however in August of 2007 he was told that the cancer had metastasized to his liver and spleen. He then started palliative chemotherapy intended to extend his life as long as possible, which was then estimated to be three to six months.


Professional accomplishments

Pausch received his
bachelor's degree in Computer Science from Brown University and his Ph.D. in Computer Science from Carnegie Mellon University. He has been a co-founder, along with Don Marinelli, of CMU's Entertainment Technology Center (ETC) and he started the Building Virtual Worlds course at CMU and taught it for ten years. He has been a National Science Foundation Presidential Young Investigator, and a Lilly Foundation Teaching Fellow. Pausch was a professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Virginia's School of Engineering and Applied Science from 1988 until 1997. He has done sabbaticals at Walt Disney Imagineering and Electronic Arts (EA), and consulted with Google on user interface design. Pausch is the author or co-author of five books and over 70 articles, and the founder of the Alice software project.

Pausch received two awards from
ACM in 2007 for his achievements in computing education. These are the Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award and the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Award for Outstanding Contributions to Computer Science Education.[1] He was also inducted as a Fellow of the ACM in 2007.

Battle with cancer

Pausch's last lecture poster
Pausch has been diagnosed with
terminal pancreatic cancer[2][3] and was told in August 2007 to expect a remaining three to six months of good health. He soon moved his family back down to Virginia.

Last Lecture
Pausch delivered his "Last Public
Lecture", entitled "Really Achieving Your Childhood Dreams", at CMU on September 18, 2007.[4] This talk was modeled after an ongoing series of lectures where top academics are asked to think deeply about what matters to them, and then give a hypothetical "final talk", i.e., "what wisdom would you try to impart to the world if you knew it was your last chance?"
Before speaking, Pausch received a long standing ovation from a large crowd of over 400 colleagues and students. When he motioned them to sit down, saying "make me earn it", some in the audience shouted back "you did!"


During the lecture, Pausch was upbeat and humorous, alternating between wisecracks, insights on computer science and engineering education, advice on building multi-disciplinary collaborations, working in groups and interacting with other people, offering inspirational life lessons, and performing push-ups on stage.


After Pausch has finished his lecture,
Steve Seabolt, on behalf of Electronic Arts, which is now collaborating with CMU in the development of Alice 3.0,[5] has pledged to honor Pausch by creating a memorial scholarship for women in computer science,[2] in recognition of Pausch's support and mentoring of women in CS and engineering.

CMU president
Jared Cohon spoke emotionally of Pausch's humanity and called his contributions to the university and to education "remarkable and stunning."[6] He then announced that CMU will celebrate Pausch's impact on the world by building and naming after Pausch a raised pedestrian bridge[7] to connect CMU's new Computer Science building and the Center for the Arts, symbolizing the way Pausch linked those two disciplines.

Finally, Brown University professor
Andries van Dam followed Pausch's last lecture with a tearful and impassioned speech praising him for his courage and leadership, calling him a role model and "a Mensch".[6]

Media coverage

Randy Pausch and his wife Jai meeting with Sting at "The Police" concert at UVa on November 6, 2007
Pausch was named "Person of the Week" on ABC's
World News with Charles Gibson on September 21.[8] His "Last Lecture" has attracted wide attention from the international media,[9] became an Internet hit, and was viewed over a million times in the first month after its delivery.[10] On October 22, 2007, Pausch appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show where he discussed his situation and recapped his "Last Lecture" for millions of TV viewers.

On October 06, 2007, Pausch joined the Pittsburgh Steelers for the day during their regular practice, after the organization learned that one of his childhood dreams mentioned in his "Last Lecture" was to play in the NFL.[12]

The Disney-owned publisher Hyperion has paid $6.7 million for the rights to publish a book about Randy Pausch called "The Last Lecture", co-authored by Randy Pausch and Wall Street Journal reporter Jeff Zaslow.[13]

A devoted Star Trek fan, Pausch was invited by film director J.J. Abrams to film a role in the latest Star Trek movie. Abrams heard of Pausch's condition and sent a personal e-mail inviting Pausch to the set. Pausch happily accepted and traveled to Los Angeles, California to shoot his scene. In addition to appearing in the film, he also has a line of dialogue.

Other lectures
Pausch gave an
updated version of his "Time Management" lecture on November 27, 2007 at the University of Virginia, to an audience of over 850 people

Books
Learning to Program with Alice, Brief Edition (with Wanda P Dann and Stephen Cooper) (2006)
ISBN 0132397757

The Last Lecture (2008) ISBN 1401323251

Bio info from Wikipedia



FINANCING
Calculators: Determine Debt
Gates Falls From Top Of World's Rich List
Microsoft Co-Founder Topped List For 13 Years


UPDATED: 10:01 am EST March 6, 2008


Bill Gates' run as the world's richest man has come to an end.



According to Forbes, investor Warren Buffett is the richest man on the planet at an estimated $62 billion. Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft and the man who topped the list for 13 straight years, fell to third.


Buffett, thanks to the surging price of Berkshire Hathaway stock, saw his fortune rise $10 billion from last year. Buffett, whose fortune is estimated based on his stake in Berkshire Hathaway and other assets, refused to comment on his net worth.


Gates is now worth $58 billion and is ranked third in the world. He is up $2 billion from a year ago.


In between Buffett and Gates is Mexican telecom tycoon Carlos Slim Helú. His net worth is estimated at $60 billion and his fortune has risen $11 billion since last year.
Buffett began buying shares in textile firm Berkshire Hathaway in 1962 and purchased a controlling stake in 1965.


Berkshire is invested in insurance, jewelry, utilities and food, as well as non-controlling stakes in Anheuser-Busch, Coca-Cola and Wells Fargo. Between 1965 and 2006, Berkshire stock returned an average of 21.4 percent a year.


In the summer of 2006 he irrevocably earmarked the majority of his Berkshire shares to charity, most going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
At the time, the gift was valued at $31 billion. However, assuming that Berkshire shares continue to rise, the final amount of the donation will far exceed that sum. Buffett gives 5 percent of his shares to charity every July.


In October, Forbes reported, Buffett issued a challenge to members of the Forbes 400 richest Americans list, saying he would donate $1 million to charity if the collective group would admit they pay less taxes, as a percentage of income, than their secretaries.


Days after issuing the challenge, Buffett appeared before Congress to encourage it to keep the estate tax. Armed with a few Forbes 400 issues, he told the hearing that "dynastic wealth, the enemy of a meritocracy, is on the rise."

Me, Myself and I




I don't know if you have ever felt like this, but I have always been a very passionate person and I try to treat everyone the way that I want to be treated. I try to watch my mouth most times, because I know I have a fly mouth. But, one thing that I have learned in this life's journey is to never try to change people...And, for all the people who sent Christmas Cards, emails, texts and phone calls regarding Ms. Kitty, she is doing just fine.

A great writer by the name of Les Brown, not Gladys Knight's ex husband, but the writer from Seattle, Washington...He said, "You can not change people, you can only change yourself"..I truly believe that, and have tried to be mindful of that when dealing with people on any level...I dont spend my time whining about what someone could have done differently, they did it the way that they wanted to do it. I said all that to say, I have the propensity to attract people who want me to do things the way that they want it done.

So, you know sometimes there is never going to be a meeting of the minds, and you just throw your hands up and say, "YOU BE YOU, AND I WILL BE ME". Let's deal with that, is there anything wrong with being an individual? I don't think so, we have to all try to get along...I don't like everything that someone does, but I have grown up enough to just take their good parts, and the ones that I don't really care for I just say, "that's just how they are" and keep it moving. Not necessarily leave them alone, or sever the kinship, but take that as part of their character, and love them in spite of the difference.

One thing my mother hates for me to say is, that "I LIKE ME, I LIKE ME AS A PERSON....I WOULD BE MY OWN FRIEND"....I think that speaks volumes about me, would you be your friend? Most people have never thought of that, I have asked so don't play...I can back this up...Do you like how you treat people, when faced with adversity? When someone calls for help, do you play them off and hope they call someone else before they get back to you? Or do you usually have their backs, follow thru with what you said you were going to do? Be just as prompt about answering their email or calling them back as you would want them to do you?

Something to think about huh? That's what I'm saying, would you want to be your own friend....I don't get everything right, far from that, but I try very hard to be the kinda of friend that I would want in someone else. Sometimes I get tired and don't want to be bothered, look at the caller id, and say, DAMN what do they want now? But, then that small still voice says, what would you want them to do for you? I usually end up calling them back and saying I didn't want to answer the phone for you because you are worrisome, but what do you want? What can I help you with?

I have three kids and six grandkids, I want someone to be there for them when they need it. So, I can't really afford not to be there for other people. It cuts both ways, what you WANT, you have to GIVE!!!!!!!

I said all that to say, I have recently discovered the best friend that I really have in this whole world is THE GIRL IN THE PICTURE, ME... This is who I really count on, other than Jesus, who is the reason I am able to depend on me, because I really just depend on him.

Beyonce has a song titled, 'Me, Myself and I, and I think it is so appropriate for this blog. Below is the lyrics to the song...The highlights in Red are the ones that I feel pertain to me or my situation....Just doing alittle reflecting today..

MAN TO GET BACK CHILD SUPPORT

Parents owe $14,460 in case of mistaken paternity, judge says
By Sandy Hodson | Staff Writer
Sunday, March 02, 2008

Judge David Roper said he felt badly for Kenneth Samuels when he learned the child he had fathered for 11 years wasn't his.

Justice was also shortchanged, the judge said, because Mr. Samuels had been paying child support all of those years.

Last month, Judge Roper ruled that Jamie Hope, the child's mother, and Oba Wallace, the child's biological father, would have to repay Mr. Samuels $14,460 in child support he had paid since 1997.

Such an order is unusual, but not unique.

"We have seen it happen before," said Sandra Jarrett of the state's Child Support Recovery Unit.

Usually there is no intent to defraud, Ms. Jarrett said. Mothers who have had relationships with more than one man might not know who the biological father is without a DNA test.

Ms. Jarrett estimated 40 percent to 45 percent of their new cases are filed by a custodial parent who never married, and a DNA test is requested to establish paternity.

Child Support Services helps about 30,000 families in Richmond, Columbia and Burke counties. Across Georgia, 500,000 families are assisted, Ms. Jarrett said.

In Mr. Samuels' case, it began April 22, 1997, when Ms. Hope opened a Child Support Services case that named Mr. Samuels the father of her child.

Mr. Samuels said he never had any reason to doubt the child was his. He signed the birth certificate, and he consented to an order to pay child support.

Mr. Wallace told the judge at a hearing last summer that he heard from different people that the child looked like him. The child called him daddy when she saw him in town, Mr. Wallace said.

Mr. Wallace said he told Ms. Hope he would take care of the child financially if he was the biological father. They decided to get a DNA test last summer, Mr. Wallace said.

The DNA test proved Mr. Wallace was the biological father, and he filed a court petition to legally establish paternity. The case was assigned to Judge Roper, who had no problem with signing the order that established legal paternity. But he said he was troubled by the position in which it left Mr. Samuels.

The judge questioned Mr. Wallace and Ms. Hope about when they first suspected Mr. Wallace was the biological father. Both eventually admitted it was around the time the child was 2.

"I've never heard (of) this gentleman until this year, and I never knew that she was seeing anyone else," Mr. Samuels told the judge last summer.

Ms. Hope told the judge she wanted a paternity test in 1997 when the baby was born but that Mr. Samuels declined. He denied that.

"You swore that he was the father when you took out a child support action," Judge Roper told Ms. Hope. He said he considered that action fraudulent and ordered Ms. Hope to repay Mr. Samuels the $14,460 he had paid in child support payments.

In February, Judge Roper ruled Mr. Wallace was liable to Mr. Samuels for the back child support, too. Judge Roper said in explaining his ruling that once paternity is established, a father can be required to pay back support to the time of birth. Since Mr. Wallace's paternity was established, he was responsible for the child support since the birth in 1997, and responsible for repaying Mr. Samuels.

Ms. Jarrett said that when a child support case is opened, the man identified as a child's father can request a DNA test. If the test comes back negative, the case against that man is closed. If it is positive, then paternity is established and Child Support Services works to obtain a court order for child support.

A man can also petition the court directly to request a legal determination of paternity, which is what Mr. Wallace did.

Paternity establishes who is responsible for the financial support of a child. If a father also desires visitation rights, he must legitimize the child, too, Judge Roper said. Although Child Support Services cannot help with visitation issues, the office can refer parents to mediation.

Child Support Services will help fathers with employment issues. It operates the Georgia Fatherhood Program to provide job counseling, training, educational assistance, placement assistance and other services. In Georgia, 25 percent of children have a case with the Child Support Services, according to the state Department of Human Resources.

Reach Sandy Hodson at (706) 823-3226 or sandy.hodson@augustachronicle.com.

Star Jones tells hubby Al to G.H.E.T.T.O.U.T


The National Enquirer is reporting that Star and Al have officially separated. Here is an excerpt of their report:

"[Star and Al] hadn't been seeing eye to eye for months and had already spent a great deal of time apart," a close friend told The Enquirer.

"Finally, Star decided it was over. She told Al at the end of January that he had 30 days to get his act together or 'get out.'" ...

"[Now] Star is planning to divorce Al. He moved his things out of their New York City home and into a place in Miami. He's trying to make a fresh start."


And here's why they say Star finally threw him out:


"I think Star felt Al has spent thei marriage riding her success while she did all the heavy lifting. She resented it. Deep down, Star is a very old-fashioned woman who believes a man should support her emotionally, physically and financially. She now believes Al failed her."